Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments

نویسندگان

چکیده

Building on a view of both narration and argumentation as dynamic concepts, this paper considers ways assessing the credibility narrative arguments constructed in empirical examples conversational discourse. I argue that key any such exercise is to pay close attention structural pragmatic details, particularly how storytelling gets embedded surrounding discourse way discursively accomplished vis-à-vis narrators’ multilayered audience may be reflective their argumentative goals.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Audience-Aware Credibility: From Understanding Audience to Establishing Credible Blogs

This study examines how bloggers establish and enhance the credibility of their blogs through a series of blogging practices. Based on an analysis of interviews with 22 independent bloggers who blog on a range of topics, we present audience-aware credibility as a theoretical construct. Audience-aware credibility is defined as how bloggers signal their credibility based on who they think their a...

متن کامل

Rethinking credible evidence synthesis.

Government regulators and systematic reviewers both aim to generate an accurate understanding of the effects of interventions. However, the methods they use, and the evidence they consider, are different. Although both focus on randomised clinical trials for determining safety and efficacy, the mostly academic community of systematic reviewers generally get their data from published reports of ...

متن کامل

Relationships between media and audiences : prospects for audience reception studies

LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in furthe...

متن کامل

Evaluating arguments from the reaction of the audience

In studying how lay people evaluate arguments, psychologists have typically focused on logical form and content. This emphasis has masked an important yet underappreciated aspect of everyday argument evaluation: social cues to argument strength. Here we focus on the ways in which observers evaluate arguments by the reaction they evoke in an audience. This type of evaluation is likely to occur e...

متن کامل

Awe the Audience: How the Narrative Trajectories Affect Audience Perception in Public Speaking

Telling a great story often involves a deliberate alteration of emotions. In this paper, we objectively measure and analyze the narrative trajectories of stories in public speaking and their impact on subjective ratings. We conduct the analysis using the transcripts of over 2000 TED talks and estimate potential audience response using over 5 million spontaneous annotations from the viewers. We ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Informal Logic

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2293-734X', '0824-2577']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i2.6506